Bitcoin’s 50% drop doesn’t signal a crisis, says hedge fund veteran Gary Bode.
Bitcoin’s nearly 50% slide from recent record highs has rattled markets, but hedge fund veteran Gary Bode argues the move reflects the asset’s inherent volatility and a misreading of Federal Reserve policy—not any fundamental breakdown.
The selloff has revived long-standing questions about bitcoin’s stability. Bode, however, says sharp drawdowns are a recurring feature of the cryptocurrency’s history and have repeatedly preceded strong recoveries rather than prolonged crises.
Writing on X, Bode described the decline as “unpleasant and jarring,” but noted that even steeper losses are common. “Eighty to ninety percent drawdowns are common,” he said, adding that investors who have tolerated bitcoin’s volatility have historically been rewarded over the long term.
Bode traced much of the recent turmoil to investor reaction following the nomination of Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair. Markets interpreted the move as signaling a shift toward tighter monetary policy, weighing on non-yielding assets such as bitcoin, gold and silver. That shift triggered margin calls on leveraged positions, accelerating the selloff.
He disputes that conclusion, pointing to Warsh’s prior public support for lower interest rates and comments from President Trump suggesting Warsh had committed to maintaining a lower federal funds rate. Bode also argued that massive and persistent fiscal deficits limit the Fed’s ability to influence longer-term Treasury yields, which are more relevant for borrowing costs across the economy. “I think the market got this one wrong,” he said, emphasizing that sentiment rather than fundamentals drove the decline.
Bode also pushed back against other popular explanations. One is that early bitcoin holders, often referred to as “whales,” are exiting en masse. While he acknowledged that some large wallets have been active, Bode framed the selling as routine profit-taking rather than a bearish signal. Sales by early adopters, he said, offer little insight into bitcoin’s long-term prospects.
Another area of concern is Strategy (MSTR), whose shares fell as bitcoin dropped below the prices at which the company accumulated much of its holdings. That has fueled speculation that founder Michael Saylor could be forced to sell. Bode described the risk as real but limited, comparing it to investor unease when a high-profile buyer builds a large stake. Such selling, he said, could weigh on prices temporarily without undermining bitcoin’s broader thesis.
Bode also addressed the growing role of “paper bitcoin,” including ETFs and derivatives that provide price exposure without transferring ownership of the underlying coins. While these products expand the amount of bitcoin exposure available for trading, he stressed they do not change bitcoin’s fixed supply cap of 21 million coins. He likened the situation to the silver market, where expanded paper trading can initially suppress prices until physical demand reasserts itself.
Concerns that rising energy costs could damage bitcoin mining economics and reduce the network’s hash rate are also overstated, Bode said. Historical data shows that hash rate declines, when they occur, typically lag price drops rather than cause them. He also pointed to emerging energy technologies, including small modular nuclear reactors and solar-powered data centers, as potential sources of cheaper power for miners in the future.
Finally, Bode challenged claims that bitcoin fails as a store of value because of its volatility. He argued that all assets carry risk, including fiat currencies backed by heavily indebted governments. Short-term price swings may be influenced by paper instruments, he said, but bitcoin’s long-term value remains anchored by its fixed supply and permissionless design.
In Bode’s view, the latest downturn is less a warning sign than a reminder of bitcoin’s nature: volatile by design. For investors, he argues, dramatic price moves are not synonymous with systemic failure—and those willing to endure them may ultimately be rewarded.
Share this content:













