A growing chorus of crypto executives says insufficient privacy on public blockchains is slowing both retail and institutional adoption, as fully transparent transaction data raises practical and competitive concerns.
Changpeng Zhao, the co-founder of Binance, recently argued that privacy could be the missing ingredient for broader crypto payments usage. While blockchain transparency has long been celebrated as a feature that promotes trust and accountability, Zhao said it can also deter real-world adoption when sensitive financial details are exposed.
On public networks, wallet balances, transfer amounts and transaction histories can often be traced. Zhao pointed to a simple example: if a company pays employees in crypto on-chain, outside observers could potentially see compensation data by tracking wallet addresses. That level of openness, he suggested, makes crypto impractical for many everyday payment use cases.
Institutional leaders echoed similar concerns at CoinDesk’s Consensus conference in Hong Kong. During a panel on the outlook for institutional markets, Fabio Frontini, CEO of Abraxas Capital Management, emphasized that large financial players require discretion when executing sizable transactions.
According to Frontini, transparency should not mean universal visibility. Transactions need to be auditable, he said, but access to detailed information should be limited to relevant stakeholders rather than broadcast publicly.
The issue has become more pressing as traditional financial instruments begin moving on-chain. In December, JPMorgan Chase arranged a $50 million commercial paper issuance for Galaxy Digital on the Solana network. The transaction, which used Circle’s USDC stablecoin for settlement and included participation from Coinbase Global and Franklin Templeton, showcased how blockchain infrastructure can streamline issuance and settlement processes.
Yet the deal also highlighted institutional hesitation around conducting large transactions on fully transparent public networks.
Emma Lovett, credit lead for the Markets Distributed Ledger Technology team at JPMorgan, said institutions need assurance that their wallet addresses and transaction histories cannot be easily uncovered by third parties. Without that confidence, large-scale migration of assets to public chains is unlikely.
Thomas Restout, CEO of liquidity provider B2C2, added that privacy is only part of the equation. Institutions also require execution certainty and robust infrastructure before deploying significant capital. Financial firms operate at enormous scale, he noted, and cannot afford operational or reputational risks tied to experimental systems.
Until blockchain networks can offer both stronger privacy safeguards and institutional-grade reliability, industry leaders suggested, adoption by both Main Street users and Wall Street institutions may remain constrained.
Share this content:
