Bitcoin and broader risk assets have been repeatedly shaken by President Donald Trump’s shifting rhetoric on Iran, leaving traders reacting to headlines rather than fundamentals. In such an environment, market participants are increasingly turning to hard data points to cut through the noise—though those signals remain far from reassuring.
Over the past month, bitcoin has traded erratically, rising on signs of de-escalation and falling on renewed hawkish commentary. One day brings optimism around peace talks, lifting crypto and equities while pressuring oil; the next brings escalation fears, sending bitcoin lower and crude prices higher. With conflicting signals from both Washington and Tehran, navigating markets has become increasingly difficult.
Amid the volatility, a handful of macro indicators offer clearer insight into where markets may be headed—and they point to mounting risks.
At the center of the uncertainty is the global oil supply shock. Since the conflict began in late February, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz—which carries roughly 20% of global seaborne oil—has nearly collapsed. In response, the International Energy Agency coordinated the largest strategic reserve release in its history, ultimately injecting more than 400 million barrels into the market.
Those emergency supplies have helped offset a daily shortfall of around 4.5 to 5 million barrels. However, those reserves are expected to run down within weeks. If flows through Hormuz are not restored, the deficit could widen dramatically to as much as 10 to 11 million barrels per day, creating what some have described as an unprecedented supply shock.
This looming imbalance suggests that the trajectory of risk assets may depend less on political messaging and more on whether physical oil supply normalizes. Without that, markets could face a renewed wave of risk aversion regardless of short-term headlines.
Shipping insurance costs offer another key signal. Premiums for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz have surged from under 1% of a ship’s value before the conflict to as high as 7.5% per trip. For a $100 million tanker, that translates into millions of dollars in additional costs.
A meaningful decline in these premiums—particularly below 2%—would indicate improving security conditions and could provide a stronger foundation for a sustained recovery in risk assets. Until then, elevated insurance costs reflect ongoing disruption and uncertainty in critical energy routes.
So far, there is little evidence of normalization. While Trump has suggested that passage through Hormuz could be secured, tanker traffic remains severely constrained. Just 21 ships have transited the strait since the conflict began, compared with more than 100 per day under normal conditions, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.
For bitcoin and other risk assets, a durable rally likely depends on a tangible recovery in these real-world indicators. Until shipping flows resume and supply pressures ease, market optimism driven by political rhetoric may continue to fade as quickly as it appears.
Share this content:
